Glossary
List of all BSC Change Proposals
CP0528 – Inconsistency between BSCP15 and BSCP508
Inconsistency between BSCP15 and BSCP508
CP0527 – IDD Part 1 – Documentation Errors and Inconsistencies
IDD Part 1 - Documentation Errors and Inconsistencies
CP0526 – To bring Method of Communication required in line with IDD
To bring Method of Communication required in line with IDD
CP0525 – To bring Method of Communication required in line with IDD
To bring Method of Communication required in line with IDD
CP0524 – To bring Method of Communication required in line with IDD
To bring Method of Communication required in line with IDD
CP0523 – To bring Method of Communication required in line with IDD
To bring Method of Communication required in line with IDD
CP0522 – To bring Method of Communication required in line with IDD
To bring Method of Communication required in line with IDD
CP0521 – Inconsistencies between BSCPs and IDD
Inconsistencies between BSCPs and IDD
CP0520 – Resolve the inconsistency on the Credit Level naming convention between the ECVAA specifications/software and the Balancing and Settlement Code. The ECVAA system functionality should be amended to report a Level 1 credit default on breach of 80% Indebtedness and a Level 2 Credit Default on breach of 90% Indebtedness for a Participant. The ECVAA Specifications should be amended where appropriate to reflect this functionality and reporting change. The Balancing and Settlement Code Section M 3.2.1 states that a Level 1 Credit Default occurs when a Participant goes above 80% Indebtedness, Section M 3.3.1 states that a Level 2 Credit Default occurs when a Participant goes above 90% Indebtedness. The ECVAA System Specification (Issue 3.4 section 4.3) states that an ‘Indebtedness Level 1’ occurs when the Participant goes above 90%. The specification also refers to a ‘Level 2 system parameter
Resolve the inconsistency on the Credit Level naming convention between the ECVAA specifications/software and the Balancing and Settlement Code. The ECVAA system functionality should be amended to report a Level 1 credit default on breach of 80% Indebtedness and a Level 2 Credit Default on breach of 90% Indebtedness for a Participant. The ECVAA Specifications should be amended where appropriate to reflect this functionality and reporting change. The Balancing and Settlement Code Section M 3.2.1 states that a Level 1 Credit Default occurs when a Participant goes above 80% Indebtedness, Section M 3.3.1 states that a Level 2 Credit Default occurs when a Participant goes above 90% Indebtedness. The ECVAA System Specification (Issue 3.4 section 4.3) states that an ‘Indebtedness Level 1’ occurs when the Participant goes above 90%. The specification also refers to a ‘Level 2 system parameter
CP0519 – Calculation by the ECVAA of a Trading Party’s ‘MEA’
Calculation by the ECVAA of a Trading Party’s ‘MEA’